Skip to content

May 14, 2025

King Lashes Out at Administration’s Decision to Cut Critical Research Budgets

With Energy, Interior Departments facing drastic budget cuts, Senator stresses “I’m going to watch what you do and not what you say”

WASHINGTON, D.C. U.S. Senator Angus King (I-ME), in a hearing of the Energy and Natural Resource (ENR) Committee, pressed Connor Prochaska, nominee to serve as the Director of Advanced Research Projects Agency within the Department of Energy, and Dr. Ned Mamula to serve as the Director of U.S. Geological Survey within the Department of the Interior, on extreme budget cuts impacting critical research programs at both departments. During his exchange with Prochaska, Senator King repeatedly asked him to justify drastic budget cuts to the Advanced Research Project Agency for Energy (ARPA-E) after he touted the value of its work, and grilled him on the Trump Administration’s attacks on renewable energy sources such as wind and solar.

“One of the sages of New England, Ralph Waldo Emerson said, ‘what you do speak so loudly that I cannot hear what you say.’ I have never been at a hearing where what's being done is at such variance with what is being said. Mr. Prochaska, you waxed eloquent about the talented and dedicated staff of ARPA-E and all the great work that they've done. Their budget’s being cut by 57%. How do you justify all this nice talk about what you're going to do when your agency's being cut more than in half? You can talk until you’re blue in the face, but what speaks here is 57% cut. Tell me. And you went through your entire testimony, all of your answers to your questions, until you got to Senator Cortez-Masto, and never once mentioned renewables, the fastest growing, cheapest source of electricity in the United States today. And let me read from the budget document, ‘green new scam technologies are not supported.’ That's in the ARPA-E budget document, green new scam technology are not supported. That means no renewables, right? You've got an order from the President of the United States, no renewables. Is that correct,” began Senator King.

“That is not correct,” said Prochaska.

“So what? What does he mean? Green, new scam technologies. He's talking about solar and wind. Everybody knows that,” replied Senator King.

“Senator, I can't opine on what the definition of that language is. I can commit to, if confirmed, that the ARPA-E and the portfolio that we investigate and we look into will include all technologies,” Prochaska responded.

“So, it was just a coincidence that when you listed the technologies, the nearest you got to renewables was a mention of geothermal. You never mentioned solar and wind, and you use the code word reliable, which is a new code word for we don't like solar and wind because they're intermittent, but as you indicated in your answer to Senator Cortez-Masto, when you have batteries with solar and wind, it's base load. Is that correct,” asked Senator King.

“Senator, it very well could be. It depends on the situation. But the portfolio that we will investigate will include all technologies and reliable is important to the energy that we need for the future, to fund some of the some of the emerging technologies that we've talked about,” Prochaska replied.

“I appreciate what you're saying here. What I'm going to watch is what you do. Understood, budgets are policy, and this budget, the policy of this budget, is a drastic cut, a drastic cut, more than half in the in ARPA-E, I think, one of the most important agencies the United States government. It's where fracking started. The shale revolution started with research funds for the Department of Energy, and we're talking about a more than half cut. So, I'm going to watch what you do and not what you say,” concluded Senator King.

Later in the hearing, Senator King raised his concerns to Dr. Mamula about the Trump Administration’s attempts to downsize the U.S. Geological Survey’s (USGS) biology and hydrology research, including the stream gauge program which provides data on river and stream flow that is critical to ensure adequate water supply and safety. During the exchange, Dr. Mamula refused to provide satisfactory answers about his familiarity with the Administration’s slashes to the USGS’ budget.

“Now, Mr. Mamula, you talked about the importance of data and science and all of those kinds of things. And yet, there have been reports in the last few weeks that biological research in the in the USGS is being cut entirely, and 25 water science centers, which are stream gages measuring storms. I get the feeling this is like, if we don't measure anything on climate change, it will go away. Is that what's going on here,” asked Senator King.

“I don't think so, Senator, thanks for the question. Let's discuss it. Again, I'm not at the survey, but I want to take a look, if confirmed, I want to go out and look at each and every single program, its budget and cuts proposed,” replied Dr. Mamula.

“Somebody has already done that and cut your budget 37% before you even walk in the door. Assuming Congress agrees, which I hope they won't,” said Senator King.

“Yeah, I don't know about that either, but I'm not familiar. But the program, the contents of the program that has a cut associated with it, I'm not familiar. I don't know what's in, what's being cut,” responded Dr. Mamula.

“I thought you're pretty familiar with USGS,” questioned Senator King.

“I am, but I don't know what —,” said Dr. Mamula.

“Do you believe it's appropriate to cut all of their biological research programs,” pressed Senator King.

“Well, I have to see what they're talking about, if they're talking about,” replied Dr. Mamula.

“All means all as I understand it,” finished Senator King.

As a member of the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, Senator King has advocated for climate solutions that deliver on the clean energy potential of the historic Inflation Reduction Act. He has repeatedly emphasized the importance of permitting reform to deliver carefully considered, timely approvals of sorely-needed clean energy projects. Senator King has also been one of the Senate’s most vocal advocates for improving energy storage technologies and development and worked to include significant storage investments in the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law and Inflation Reduction Act. Earlier this year, Senator King reiterated the importance of an “all of the above” energy policy strategy during an ENR hearing considering the nominations of Energy Secretary Chris Wright and Interior Secretary Doug Burgum. In a recent ENR hearing, he received agreement from two nominees to prioritize renewable energy storage technology.

###


Next Article » « Previous Article